Okay, so for no particular reason (alright there was totally a reason, but I'm not telling you) I was thinking about first person perspective in storytelling.
You know the one that goes "I" rather than "You" (second), or "Bob" (third).
I remembered an occasion in my grade twelve English class when my teacher said that she hated first person perspective and would never read it because she didn't like being made into the narrator. Now, at the time I didn't think much on it, I just put it down to a difference in opinion. I love first person, I find it creates a more intimate experience where I can really get to know characters and become immersed in their world.
It's only later that I became aware of how strange that viewpoint is to me. I realized exactly what my teacher was saying. She couldn't separate herself from the narrator, she immediately read "I" like it should be an internalized thought originating in her own mind and felt violated by the trespass.
I can't get over how bizarre the entire notion is. When I read "I", it seems to me as if the main character is telling me a story of personal experience, as if I myself am inside the character's own head. The idea that I was the character never even crossed my mind.
I think this teacher was having a similar reaction to first person perspective that I have to second person, the feeling that an unseen omnipotent force is attempting to direct my actions.*
I wonder if she has trouble reading opinion pieces, unable to separate the author's thoughts from her own. Could she read this blog post comfortably, automatically feeling it was me the student writing it, or would she have to constantly make an effort of will to remain separate from the narrator.
How does a person come to understand first person in such a way? Why is it some people might not be able to see the division between "I" said as a mental realization of self, and "I" said as a person referring to themselves. Is it a difference in education? Or is it a difference in intelligence? Is it in fact indiscriminate across intellectual levels and a result of something completely unrelated? A result of how our brains are wired?
I have done a lot of research about the different perspectives and have written in all three. I am confident I have the correct interpretation, but is it possible that the people who think as I do are the ones inclined to write about it in the first place. Do all people with no desire to write see as my teacher did? Or is it that most people see as she does and revel in the perversity of seeing themselves as the character? Is it even a perversity? Perhaps the intention of first person is to put the reader in the story. Are my teacher and I both odd in that she was uncomfortable with the idea and I simply misinterpreted it?
Am I the one who is in fact perverse? Enjoying an intimate view in a fictional stranger's life?
How do you read first person? Where do you stand when you are behind the words? Are you thinking them or are they thought to you?
* When I read second person I have to remind myself that they are not referring to "me" directly but an unknown hypothetical and possibly very specifically idealized reader. Perhaps the "you" was never even meant to read it, but the author wrote it to express certain feelings to a particular person or group of people.
Monday, October 11, 2010
Sunday, October 3, 2010
Fail Dogs

I really should be working on my drawing project right now, after all, it is due on Wednesday. But I just can't concentrate.
I'm also having one of those days where everything I do seems embarrassingly inadequate. You know, like, "LOL, you're supposed to be a professional artist? What is this crap then?"
It doesn't help that I'm trying to draw non-human characters for the first time in a loooooong time (who knew rabbits were that hard to draw?). I seem to be suffering from Default Animal = Dog, thus Rabbit = Dog With Big Teeth. And lets not even get started on ferrets, Ferret = Long Dog? No! Self, listen, Rabbits and Ferrets are not Dogs. Can we get past this and get on with the arting now? No? Well fine then.
And such has been my past two days.
Thursday, September 30, 2010
The Second Purpose of this Blog

Hi!
Er, hello again. You may have noticed (If you're one of the seven-or-so people who ever read this) that all but the first post have suddenly disappeared. That's because this is the second year of Digital, and the second year of Blog!
And also because I looked back and suddenly realized how bad those old posts were.
So now I'm going to write some better posts.
At least until next year, when I'll decide it's all terrible and DELETE EVERYTHING
(And. And! I'm going to make you pictures now!)
Labels:
beware,
delusions of grandeur,
digital class,
first post
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
The Purpose of this Blog
To be quite honest, there is no great and honorable purpose behind the creation of this blog. This blog is a mandatory requirement for my digital class, a necessary evil if you will.
I realize that no one will actually be reading this, so if there are no objections I'm just going to pretend that there's a great big audience out there waiting patiently for my posts and hanging on my every word.
So, my adoring public, what can you expect from this blog? Well it'll be filled with artsy stuff from my classes, musings of my deluded mind, and probably some fangirl miscelania. Don't take anything I say too seriously, I know I don't.
Labels:
beware,
delusions of grandeur,
digital class,
first post
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)